Haile v waltham forest 2015
WebMay 20, 2015 · In a ruling that marks a “significant departure” from 20 years of settled law, an appeal was allowed against Waltham Forest Council’s decision that a young pregnant woman, Saba Haile, had made herself … http://ukscblog.com/case-comment-haile-v-london-borough-of-waltham-forest-2015-uksc-34/
Haile v waltham forest 2015
Did you know?
WebHot on the heels of Nzolameso (suitability of accommodation) and Hotak (priority need) comes Haile v Waltham Forest LBC [2015] UKSC 34 which re-visits the most longstanding and important House of Lords decision on intentional homelessness (Din v Wandsworth [1981] UKHL 14) and manages – just about – not to overrule it, while at the same time ... Web2015 - •Hotak, Kanu & Johnson [2015] UKSC 30, [2015] 2 WLR 1341 – vulnerability & PSED. •Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] UKSC 34, [2015] HLR 24 – intentional homelessness. •Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22, [2015] HLR 22 – out of borough placements and the ‘best interests of the child’.
WebJul 12, 2016 · The Supreme Court considered Din in Haile v Waltham Forest LBC [2015] 1 AC 1471, but the judgments of the Supreme Court in that case do not affect the concept of "settled" accommodation as explained by Ackner LJ and Lord Hoffmann in the passages set out above. 5. As Ackner LJ explained, the question whether accommodation is settled is … WebAssistant Editor. Encyclopedia of Housing Law and Practice. Articles “Coppard v Barrington, County Court at Basingstoke, 29 August 2024“, Legal Action 2024, November, 40-41 (contributor). “Panayiotou v Waltham Forest LBC; Smith v Haringey LBC [2024] EWCA 1624, 19 October 2024“, Lime Legal Housing Law Week, 25 October 2024. …
http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-haile-v-london-borough-of-waltham-forest-2015-uksc-34/ WebHaile v Waltham Forest: Intentional homelessness, queue jumping and the “I would have been homeless anyway” argument 10 Sep 2015; Judicial Review as Sliding Scales 01 Jul 2015; The Supreme Court on vulnerability 11 Jun 2015; No such thing as an ‘ordinary homeless person’ 26 May 2015
Web[2015] UKSC 34 UKSC 2014/0185Haile (Appellant) v London Borough of Waltham Forest (Respondent) On appeal from the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) (England a...
WebMay 20, 2015 · Haile v the London Borough of Waltham Forest establishes a new legal test for intentional homelessness to which every UK local authority will now have to adhere. BACKGROUND TO THE CASE … maria purtellWebCase Comment Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2015] Authors : Christopher Busst Published date : 15-07-2016 Status : Published A homeless person may be owed … maria purificacion salazar molineroWebNov 30, 2016 · Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] UKSC 34, [2015] HLR 24 – on intentional homelessness. 2. In 2016, the dust has begun to settle in the … mariapurtell718 gmail.comWebMay 22, 2015 · The case, known as Haile v the London Borough of Waltham Forest, could now set legal precedent for all challenging council’s interpretation of the term. Councils may have to take into account events or circumstances which take place after an applicant leaves or loses their home before they can decide if someone is intentionally homeless. maria puschbeck-raetzellmaria puppetWebMs Haile contends that she could not be classified as intentionally homeless after 15 February 2012. The property which she had abandoned was no longer available for her … maria puzio okoWebCommission and others intervening) [2015] UKSC 30; [2015] 2 W.L.R. 1341: Haile v Waltham Forest London Borough Council [2015] UKSC 34; [2015] 2 W.L.R. 1441: Nzolameso v Westminster CC [2015] UKSC 22; [2015] H.L.R. 22. Introduction From both constitutional law and administrative law perspectives, a Supreme Court maria puzio