WebUse the figure to answer the question that follows: When written in the correct order, the two-column proof below describes the statements and reasons for proving that corresponding angles are congruent: Which is the most logical order of statements and reasons I, II, and III to complete the proof? (5 points) Nov 18 2024 08:12 AM Solutions: WebQuestion: Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Diana's Proof Statement Justification ∠1 + ∠2 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠4 = 180° Definition of Supplementary Angles ∠1 + ∠2 = ∠1 + ∠4 Transitive Property of Equality
DBA Review 2.09-2 - DBA REVIEW 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Define...
WebDiana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct? Line segment NT intersects line segment MR forming four angles. … WebThe following is an incomplete paragraph proving that ∠WRS ≅ ∠VQT, given the information in the figure where. According to the given information, is parallel to, while angles SQU and VQT are vertical angles. Angle VQT is congruent to angle SQU by the Vertical Angles Theorem. Because angles SQU and WRS are________ angles, they are ... simplicity\\u0027s 17
Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that
WebOct 5, 2024 · Diana and Joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. Who is correct?. . Diana’s Proof. . Statement Justification . 1 + 2 = 180° … WebJun 12, 2024 · Diana and joby wrote the following proofs to prove that vertical angles are congruent. who is correct? . diana’s proof. statement justification . 1 + 2 = 180° definition of supplementary angles . 1 + 4 = 180° definition of supplementary angles . 1 + 2 = 1 + 4 transitive property of equality . . joby’s proof. statement justification . 2 = 4 … WebJan 28, 2024 · I will supply the proof; you figure what is wrong with the proof given in the problem. Draw a figure!!!! Construct the line segments LK and LJ. In triangles LMJ and LMK: LM is common. JM = LM because LM is the bisector of JK (you might use congruent instead of equal) The 2 triangles are right triangles because LM is the perpendicular bisector of JK simplicity\\u0027s 12